<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
    <title>anirban · basu - trustworthiness</title>
    <subtitle>Researcher in Computational Trust, Privacy, Security and Artificial Intelligence</subtitle>
    <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://anirbanbasu.netlify.app/tags/trustworthiness/atom.xml"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://anirbanbasu.netlify.app"/>
    <generator uri="https://www.getzola.org/">Zola</generator>
    <updated>2026-04-24T00:00:00+00:00</updated>
    <id>https://anirbanbasu.netlify.app/tags/trustworthiness/atom.xml</id>
    <entry xml:lang="en">
        <title>SCATMAN: A Framework for Enhancing Trustworthiness in Digital Supply Chains</title>
        <published>2023-11-01T00:00:00+00:00</published>
        <updated>2026-04-24T00:00:00+00:00</updated>
        
        <author>
          <name>Anirban Basu</name>
        </author>
        
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://anirbanbasu.netlify.app/publications/eckel2023scatman/"/>
        <id>https://anirbanbasu.netlify.app/publications/eckel2023scatman/</id>
        
        <content type="html" xml:base="https://anirbanbasu.netlify.app/publications/eckel2023scatman/">&lt;!-- citation: eckel2023scatman --&gt;
&lt;h3&gt;&lt;i&gt;Michael Eckel, &lt;u&gt;Anirban Basu&lt;/u&gt;, Satoshi Kai, Hevais Simo Fhom, Sinisa Dukanovic, Henk Birkholz, Shingo Hane and Matthias Lieske&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/h3&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&lt;b&gt;Abstract:&lt;/b&gt; In this paper, we present a framework and an architecture that aim to enable and manage trust in supply chains. Our architecture addresses the authenticity and integrity of devices and processes within heterogeneous system landscapes. We identify and discuss the current challenges in digital supply chains and lay out security, privacy, and interoperability requirements that must be met for successful implementation. We hypothesize that the overall perception of trust in a supply chain depends on the trustworthiness of all digital systems involved, including hardware, software, and information flow. Our proposed architecture helps enhance trustworthiness based on verifiable, indisputable, and believable digital evidence for devices and processes in supply chains, including the entire hardware and software lifecycles. We actively advocate for a mixed landscape of centralized and decentralized solutions for the storage of evidence and trust information. This can include traditional centralized databases and distributed ledger technologies. We discuss the auditability and accountability of digital evidence using trust-enabling technologies, and present a preliminary proof-of-concept (PoC) implementation in a real-world application scenario.&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;table class=&quot;table-publication-metadata&quot;&gt;
&lt;tbody&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;
&lt;th scope=&quot;col&quot;&gt;address&lt;/th&gt;
&lt;td&gt;Exeter, UK&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;
&lt;th scope=&quot;col&quot;&gt;booktitle&lt;/th&gt;
&lt;td&gt;Proceedings of the IEEE 22nd International Conference on Trust, Security and Privacy in Computing and Communications (TrustCom)&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;
&lt;th scope=&quot;col&quot;&gt;doi&lt;/th&gt;
&lt;td&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://doi.org/10.1109/TrustCom60117.2023.00110&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;10.1109/TrustCom60117.2023.00110&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;
&lt;th scope=&quot;col&quot;&gt;keywords&lt;/th&gt;
&lt;td&gt;privacy, distributed-ledger, digital-systems, supply-chains, distributed-databases, computer-architecture, software, trustworthiness, integrity, transparency, trusted-computing, confidential-computing, society-5-0, industrie-4-0, digital-twin, supply-chain-security, distributed-system-security, smart-factory, blockchain-technology&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;
&lt;th scope=&quot;col&quot;&gt;month&lt;/th&gt;
&lt;td&gt;11&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;
&lt;th scope=&quot;col&quot;&gt;pages&lt;/th&gt;
&lt;td&gt;750-761&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;/tbody&gt;
&lt;/table&gt;
&lt;details&gt;
&lt;summary&gt;Cite this publication, using BibTeX&lt;/summary&gt;
&lt;pre class=&quot;giallo&quot; style=&quot;color: #F8F8F2; background-color: #272822;&quot; &gt;&lt;code data-lang=&quot;bibtex&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;giallo-l&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;color: #F92672;&quot;&gt;@inproceedings&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span&gt;{&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;color: #A6E22E;text-decoration: underline;&quot;&gt;eckel2023scatman&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span&gt;,&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;
&lt;span class=&quot;giallo-l&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;color: #66D9EF;&quot;&gt;  abstract&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span&gt; = {In this paper, we present a framework and an architecture that aim to enable and manage trust in supply chains. Our architecture addresses the authenticity and integrity of devices and processes within heterogeneous system landscapes. We identify and discuss the current challenges in digital supply chains and lay out security, privacy, and interoperability requirements that must be met for successful implementation. We hypothesize that the overall perception of trust in a supply chain depends on the trustworthiness of all digital systems involved, including hardware, software, and information flow. Our proposed architecture helps enhance trustworthiness based on verifiable, indisputable, and believable digital evidence for devices and processes in supply chains, including the entire hardware and software lifecycles. We actively advocate for a mixed landscape of centralized and decentralized solutions for the storage of evidence and trust information. This can include traditional centralized databases and distributed ledger technologies. We discuss the auditability and accountability of digital evidence using trust-enabling technologies, and present a preliminary proof-of-concept (PoC) implementation in a real-world application scenario.},&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;
&lt;span class=&quot;giallo-l&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;color: #66D9EF;&quot;&gt;  address&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span&gt; = {Exeter, UK},&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;
&lt;span class=&quot;giallo-l&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;color: #66D9EF;&quot;&gt;  author&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span&gt; = {Eckel, Michael and Basu, Anirban and Kai, Satoshi and Simo Fhom, Hevais and Dukanovic, Sinisa and Birkholz, Henk and Hane, Shingo and Lieske, Matthias },&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;
&lt;span class=&quot;giallo-l&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;color: #66D9EF;&quot;&gt;  booktitle&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span&gt; = {Proceedings of the IEEE 22nd International Conference on Trust, Security and Privacy in Computing and Communications (TrustCom)},&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;
&lt;span class=&quot;giallo-l&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;color: #66D9EF;&quot;&gt;  doi&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span&gt; = {10.1109/TrustCom60117.2023.00110},&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;
&lt;span class=&quot;giallo-l&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;color: #66D9EF;&quot;&gt;  keywords&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span&gt; = {Privacy;Distributed ledger;Digital systems;Supply chains;Distributed databases;Computer architecture;Software;trustworthiness;integrity;transparency;Trusted Computing;confidential computing;Society 5.0;Industrie 4.0;digital twin;supply chain security;distributed system security;smart factory;blockchain technology},&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;
&lt;span class=&quot;giallo-l&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;color: #66D9EF;&quot;&gt;  month&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span&gt; = {November},&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;
&lt;span class=&quot;giallo-l&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;color: #66D9EF;&quot;&gt;  pages&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span&gt; = {750-761},&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;
&lt;span class=&quot;giallo-l&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;color: #66D9EF;&quot;&gt;  title&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span&gt; = {SCATMAN: A Framework for Enhancing Trustworthiness in Digital Supply Chains},&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;
&lt;span class=&quot;giallo-l&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;color: #66D9EF;&quot;&gt;  year&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span&gt; = {2023},&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;
&lt;span class=&quot;giallo-l&quot;&gt;&lt;span&gt;}&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/code&gt;&lt;/pre&gt;&lt;/details&gt;
</content>
        
    </entry>
    <entry xml:lang="en">
        <title>Software and its perceived trustworthiness</title>
        <published>2023-10-19T00:00:00+00:00</published>
        <updated>2026-04-24T00:00:00+00:00</updated>
        
        <author>
          <name>Anirban Basu</name>
        </author>
        
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://anirbanbasu.netlify.app/publications/basu2023perceivedtrustworthiness/"/>
        <id>https://anirbanbasu.netlify.app/publications/basu2023perceivedtrustworthiness/</id>
        
        <content type="html" xml:base="https://anirbanbasu.netlify.app/publications/basu2023perceivedtrustworthiness/">&lt;!-- citation: basu2023perceivedtrustworthiness --&gt;
&lt;h3&gt;&lt;i&gt;&lt;u&gt;Anirban Basu&lt;/u&gt; and Satoshi Kai&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/h3&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&lt;b&gt;Abstract:&lt;/b&gt; Trust is a pervasive and essential driver for sustainable interactions between social entities and the functioning of a society as a whole. Trust, from the decisional perspective, has been summarised as &#39;the act of choosing to put oneself into a situation of risk, where the outcomes are dependent on the actions of another&#39; [18]. Trust is observed to be contextual, subjective, idiosyncratic and often only really understood from the perspective of an individual [8]. The term trust system, coined in [23], is &#39;where computational tools, humans and trust reasoning capabilities come together to accomplish something where trust is an enabling factor&#39;. In software supply chains and value chains, adequate measures do not exit beyond attempts to enforce trust through cryptographic verification, in order to faciliate stakeholders to make trust deliberations about the entities in supply and value chains. In this position paper, we propose the blueprint of a framework for the assessment of perceived trustworthiness in software supply chains such that a trustor is empowered, as opposed to enforced, to make decisions based on their trust deliberations.&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;table class=&quot;table-publication-metadata&quot;&gt;
&lt;tbody&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;
&lt;th scope=&quot;col&quot;&gt;address&lt;/th&gt;
&lt;td&gt;Amsterdam, Netherlands&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;
&lt;th scope=&quot;col&quot;&gt;booktitle&lt;/th&gt;
&lt;td&gt;Proceedings of the IFIP WG 11.11 International Conference on Trust Management (IFIPTM)&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;
&lt;th scope=&quot;col&quot;&gt;day&lt;/th&gt;
&lt;td&gt;19&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;
&lt;th scope=&quot;col&quot;&gt;doi&lt;/th&gt;
&lt;td&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-76714-2_7&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;10.1007/978-3-031-76714-2_7&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;
&lt;th scope=&quot;col&quot;&gt;isbn&lt;/th&gt;
&lt;td&gt;978-3-031-76714-2&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;
&lt;th scope=&quot;col&quot;&gt;keywords&lt;/th&gt;
&lt;td&gt;trust, trustworthiness, perceived-trustworthiness, software-supply-chain, security&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;
&lt;th scope=&quot;col&quot;&gt;month&lt;/th&gt;
&lt;td&gt;10&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;
&lt;th scope=&quot;col&quot;&gt;pages&lt;/th&gt;
&lt;td&gt;105-120&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;
&lt;th scope=&quot;col&quot;&gt;publisher&lt;/th&gt;
&lt;td&gt;Springer Nature, Switzerland&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;/tbody&gt;
&lt;/table&gt;
&lt;details&gt;
&lt;summary&gt;Cite this publication, using BibTeX&lt;/summary&gt;
&lt;pre class=&quot;giallo&quot; style=&quot;color: #F8F8F2; background-color: #272822;&quot; &gt;&lt;code data-lang=&quot;bibtex&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;giallo-l&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;color: #F92672;&quot;&gt;@inproceedings&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span&gt;{&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;color: #A6E22E;text-decoration: underline;&quot;&gt;basu2023perceivedtrustworthiness&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span&gt;,&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;
&lt;span class=&quot;giallo-l&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;color: #66D9EF;&quot;&gt;  abstract&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span&gt; = {Trust is a pervasive and essential driver for sustainable interactions between social entities and the functioning of a society as a whole. Trust, from the decisional perspective, has been summarised as &amp;#39;the act of choosing to put oneself into a situation of risk, where the outcomes are dependent on the actions of another&amp;#39; [18]. Trust is observed to be contextual, subjective, idiosyncratic and often only really understood from the perspective of an individual [8]. The term trust system, coined in [23], is &amp;#39;where computational tools, humans and trust reasoning capabilities come together to accomplish something where trust is an enabling factor&amp;#39;. In software supply chains and value chains, adequate measures do not exit beyond attempts to enforce trust through cryptographic verification, in order to faciliate stakeholders to make trust deliberations about the entities in supply and value chains. In this position paper, we propose the blueprint of a framework for the assessment of perceived trustworthiness in software supply chains such that a trustor is empowered, as opposed to enforced, to make decisions based on their trust deliberations.},&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;
&lt;span class=&quot;giallo-l&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;color: #66D9EF;&quot;&gt;  address&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span&gt; = {Amsterdam, Netherlands},&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;
&lt;span class=&quot;giallo-l&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;color: #66D9EF;&quot;&gt;  author&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span&gt; = {Basu, Anirban and Kai, Satoshi},&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;
&lt;span class=&quot;giallo-l&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;color: #66D9EF;&quot;&gt;  booktitle&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span&gt; = {Proceedings of the IFIP WG 11.11 International Conference on Trust Management (IFIPTM)},&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;
&lt;span class=&quot;giallo-l&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;color: #66D9EF;&quot;&gt;  day&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span&gt; = {19},&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;
&lt;span class=&quot;giallo-l&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;color: #66D9EF;&quot;&gt;  doi&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span&gt; = {10.1007/978-3-031-76714-2_7},&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;
&lt;span class=&quot;giallo-l&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;color: #66D9EF;&quot;&gt;  isbn&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span&gt; = {978-3-031-76714-2},&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;
&lt;span class=&quot;giallo-l&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;color: #66D9EF;&quot;&gt;  keywords&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span&gt; = {trust;trustworthiness;perceived trustworthiness;software supply chain;security},&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;
&lt;span class=&quot;giallo-l&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;color: #66D9EF;&quot;&gt;  month&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span&gt; = {October},&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;
&lt;span class=&quot;giallo-l&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;color: #66D9EF;&quot;&gt;  pages&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span&gt; = {105-120},&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;
&lt;span class=&quot;giallo-l&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;color: #66D9EF;&quot;&gt;  publisher&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span&gt; = {Springer Nature, Switzerland},&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;
&lt;span class=&quot;giallo-l&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;color: #66D9EF;&quot;&gt;  title&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span&gt; = {Software and its perceived trustworthiness},&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;
&lt;span class=&quot;giallo-l&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;color: #66D9EF;&quot;&gt;  year&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span&gt; = {2023},&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;
&lt;span class=&quot;giallo-l&quot;&gt;&lt;span&gt;}&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/code&gt;&lt;/pre&gt;&lt;/details&gt;
</content>
        
    </entry>
    <entry xml:lang="en">
        <title>Thinking about Trust: People, Process, and Place</title>
        <published>2020-06-12T00:00:00+00:00</published>
        <updated>2026-04-24T00:00:00+00:00</updated>
        
        <author>
          <name>Anirban Basu</name>
        </author>
        
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://anirbanbasu.netlify.app/publications/marsh2020thinking/"/>
        <id>https://anirbanbasu.netlify.app/publications/marsh2020thinking/</id>
        
        <content type="html" xml:base="https://anirbanbasu.netlify.app/publications/marsh2020thinking/">&lt;!-- citation: marsh2020thinking --&gt;
&lt;h3&gt;&lt;i&gt;Stephen Marsh, Tosan Atele-Williams, &lt;u&gt;Anirban Basu&lt;/u&gt;, Natasha Dwyer, Peter R. Lewis, Hector Miller-Bakewell and Jeremy Pitt&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/h3&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&lt;b&gt;Abstract:&lt;/b&gt; This brief paper is about trust. It explores the phenomenon from various angles, with the implicit assumptions that trust can be measured in some ways, that trust can be compared and rated, and that trust is of worth when we consider entities from data, through artificial intelligences, to humans, with side trips along the way to animals. It explores trust systems and trust empowerment as opposed to trust enforcement, the creation of trust models, applications of trust, and the reasons why trust is of worth.&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;table class=&quot;table-publication-metadata&quot;&gt;
&lt;tbody&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;
&lt;th scope=&quot;col&quot;&gt;day&lt;/th&gt;
&lt;td&gt;12&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;
&lt;th scope=&quot;col&quot;&gt;doi&lt;/th&gt;
&lt;td&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://doi.org/10.1016/j.patter.2020.100039&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;10.1016/j.patter.2020.100039&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;
&lt;th scope=&quot;col&quot;&gt;issue&lt;/th&gt;
&lt;td&gt;3&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;
&lt;th scope=&quot;col&quot;&gt;journal&lt;/th&gt;
&lt;td&gt;Elsevier Cell Patterns&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;
&lt;th scope=&quot;col&quot;&gt;keywords&lt;/th&gt;
&lt;td&gt;trust, trustworthiness, data, people, trust-empowerment, artificial-intelligence&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;
&lt;th scope=&quot;col&quot;&gt;month&lt;/th&gt;
&lt;td&gt;06&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;
&lt;th scope=&quot;col&quot;&gt;publisher&lt;/th&gt;
&lt;td&gt;Elsevier&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;
&lt;th scope=&quot;col&quot;&gt;volume&lt;/th&gt;
&lt;td&gt;1&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;/tbody&gt;
&lt;/table&gt;
&lt;details&gt;
&lt;summary&gt;Cite this publication, using BibTeX&lt;/summary&gt;
&lt;pre class=&quot;giallo&quot; style=&quot;color: #F8F8F2; background-color: #272822;&quot; &gt;&lt;code data-lang=&quot;bibtex&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;giallo-l&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;color: #F92672;&quot;&gt;@article&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span&gt;{&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;color: #A6E22E;text-decoration: underline;&quot;&gt;marsh2020thinking&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span&gt;,&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;
&lt;span class=&quot;giallo-l&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;color: #66D9EF;&quot;&gt;  abstract&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span&gt; = {This brief paper is about trust. It explores the phenomenon from various angles, with the implicit assumptions that trust can be measured in some ways, that trust can be compared and rated, and that trust is of worth when we consider entities from data, through artificial intelligences, to humans, with side trips along the way to animals. It explores trust systems and trust empowerment as opposed to trust enforcement, the creation of trust models, applications of trust, and the reasons why trust is of worth.},&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;
&lt;span class=&quot;giallo-l&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;color: #66D9EF;&quot;&gt;  author&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span&gt; = {Marsh, Stephen and Atele-Williams, Tosan and Basu, Anirban and Dwyer, Natasha and Lewis, Peter R.\  and Miller-Bakewell, Hector and Pitt, Jeremy},&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;
&lt;span class=&quot;giallo-l&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;color: #66D9EF;&quot;&gt;  day&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span&gt; = {12},&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;
&lt;span class=&quot;giallo-l&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;color: #66D9EF;&quot;&gt;  doi&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span&gt; = {10.1016/j.patter.2020.100039},&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;
&lt;span class=&quot;giallo-l&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;color: #66D9EF;&quot;&gt;  issue&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span&gt; = {3},&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;
&lt;span class=&quot;giallo-l&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;color: #66D9EF;&quot;&gt;  journal&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span&gt; = {Elsevier Cell Patterns},&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;
&lt;span class=&quot;giallo-l&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;color: #66D9EF;&quot;&gt;  keywords&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span&gt; = {trust;trustworthiness;data;people;trust empowerment;artificial intelligence},&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;
&lt;span class=&quot;giallo-l&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;color: #66D9EF;&quot;&gt;  month&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span&gt; = {June},&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;
&lt;span class=&quot;giallo-l&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;color: #66D9EF;&quot;&gt;  publisher&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span&gt; = {Elsevier},&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;
&lt;span class=&quot;giallo-l&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;color: #66D9EF;&quot;&gt;  title&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span&gt; = {Thinking about Trust: People, Process, and Place},&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;
&lt;span class=&quot;giallo-l&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;color: #66D9EF;&quot;&gt;  volume&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span&gt; = {1},&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;
&lt;span class=&quot;giallo-l&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;color: #66D9EF;&quot;&gt;  year&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span&gt; = {2020},&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;
&lt;span class=&quot;giallo-l&quot;&gt;&lt;span&gt;}&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/code&gt;&lt;/pre&gt;&lt;/details&gt;
</content>
        
    </entry>
</feed>
