<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
    <title>anirban · basu - publications</title>
    <subtitle>Researcher in Computational Trust, Privacy, Security and Artificial Intelligence</subtitle>
    <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://anirbanbasu.netlify.app/categories/publications/atom.xml"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://anirbanbasu.netlify.app"/>
    <generator uri="https://www.getzola.org/">Zola</generator>
    <updated>2026-04-24T00:00:00+00:00</updated>
    <id>https://anirbanbasu.netlify.app/categories/publications/atom.xml</id>
    <entry xml:lang="en">
        <title>Practical confidential data cleaning using trusted execution environments</title>
        <published>2025-08-04T00:00:00+00:00</published>
        <updated>2026-04-24T00:00:00+00:00</updated>
        
        <author>
          <name>Anirban Basu</name>
        </author>
        
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://anirbanbasu.netlify.app/publications/basu2025practical/"/>
        <id>https://anirbanbasu.netlify.app/publications/basu2025practical/</id>
        
        <content type="html" xml:base="https://anirbanbasu.netlify.app/publications/basu2025practical/">&lt;!-- citation: basu2025practical --&gt;
&lt;h3&gt;&lt;i&gt;&lt;u&gt;Anirban Basu&lt;/u&gt;, Masayuki Yoshino and Minako Toba&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/h3&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&lt;b&gt;Abstract:&lt;/b&gt; Data cleaning, also known as data cleansing or data scrubbing, is the process of identifying and correcting errors, inconsistencies, and inaccuracies in datasets. It is a crucial step in statistical analysis and machine learning as the quality of the input data directly affects the reliability and validity of the results obtained from any analysis. Data cleaning, when outsourced, poses privacy and confidentiality challenges. To address these, there has been recent research focus on privacy and confidentiality preserving data cleaning. In this paper, we propose a practical qualitative data cleaning system that preserves the privacy and confidentiality of the data utilising trusted execution environments. We have implemented our system in Python and deployed it using the Gramine library operating system on Intel Software Guard Extensions (SGX) hardware.&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;table class=&quot;table-publication-metadata&quot;&gt;
&lt;tbody&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;
&lt;th scope=&quot;col&quot;&gt;address&lt;/th&gt;
&lt;td&gt;Chania, Greece&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;
&lt;th scope=&quot;col&quot;&gt;booktitle&lt;/th&gt;
&lt;td&gt;Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Cyber Security and Resilience (CSR)&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;
&lt;th scope=&quot;col&quot;&gt;day&lt;/th&gt;
&lt;td&gt;04&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;
&lt;th scope=&quot;col&quot;&gt;doi&lt;/th&gt;
&lt;td&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://doi.org/10.1109/CSR64739.2025.11130151&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;10.1109/CSR64739.2025.11130151&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;
&lt;th scope=&quot;col&quot;&gt;keywords&lt;/th&gt;
&lt;td&gt;data-privacy, statistical-analysis, operating-systems, machine-learning, cleaning, software, security, reliability, resilience, python, trusted-execution-environments, data-cleaning, security, privacy, confidentiality&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;
&lt;th scope=&quot;col&quot;&gt;month&lt;/th&gt;
&lt;td&gt;08&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;
&lt;th scope=&quot;col&quot;&gt;pages&lt;/th&gt;
&lt;td&gt;342-349&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;/tbody&gt;
&lt;/table&gt;
&lt;details&gt;
&lt;summary&gt;Cite this publication, using BibTeX&lt;/summary&gt;
&lt;pre class=&quot;giallo&quot; style=&quot;color: #F8F8F2; background-color: #272822;&quot; &gt;&lt;code data-lang=&quot;bibtex&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;giallo-l&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;color: #F92672;&quot;&gt;@inproceedings&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span&gt;{&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;color: #A6E22E;text-decoration: underline;&quot;&gt;basu2025practical&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span&gt;,&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;
&lt;span class=&quot;giallo-l&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;color: #66D9EF;&quot;&gt;  abstract&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span&gt; = {Data cleaning, also known as data cleansing or data scrubbing, is the process of identifying and correcting errors, inconsistencies, and inaccuracies in datasets. It is a crucial step in statistical analysis and machine learning as the quality of the input data directly affects the reliability and validity of the results obtained from any analysis. Data cleaning, when outsourced, poses privacy and confidentiality challenges. To address these, there has been recent research focus on privacy and confidentiality preserving data cleaning. In this paper, we propose a practical qualitative data cleaning system that preserves the privacy and confidentiality of the data utilising trusted execution environments. We have implemented our system in Python and deployed it using the Gramine library operating system on Intel Software Guard Extensions (SGX) hardware.},&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;
&lt;span class=&quot;giallo-l&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;color: #66D9EF;&quot;&gt;  address&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span&gt; = {Chania, Greece},&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;
&lt;span class=&quot;giallo-l&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;color: #66D9EF;&quot;&gt;  author&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span&gt; = {Basu, Anirban and Yoshino, Masayuki and Toba, Minako},&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;
&lt;span class=&quot;giallo-l&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;color: #66D9EF;&quot;&gt;  booktitle&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span&gt; = {Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Cyber Security and Resilience (CSR)},&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;
&lt;span class=&quot;giallo-l&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;color: #66D9EF;&quot;&gt;  day&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span&gt; = {4},&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;
&lt;span class=&quot;giallo-l&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;color: #66D9EF;&quot;&gt;  doi&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span&gt; = {10.1109/CSR64739.2025.11130151},&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;
&lt;span class=&quot;giallo-l&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;color: #66D9EF;&quot;&gt;  keywords&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span&gt; = {Data privacy;Statistical analysis;Operating systems;Machine learning;Cleaning;Software;Security;Reliability;Resilience;Python;trusted execution environments;data cleaning;security;privacy;confidentiality},&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;
&lt;span class=&quot;giallo-l&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;color: #66D9EF;&quot;&gt;  month&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span&gt; = {August},&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;
&lt;span class=&quot;giallo-l&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;color: #66D9EF;&quot;&gt;  pages&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span&gt; = {342-349},&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;
&lt;span class=&quot;giallo-l&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;color: #66D9EF;&quot;&gt;  title&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span&gt; = {Practical confidential data cleaning using trusted execution environments},&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;
&lt;span class=&quot;giallo-l&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;color: #66D9EF;&quot;&gt;  year&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span&gt; = {2025},&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;
&lt;span class=&quot;giallo-l&quot;&gt;&lt;span&gt;}&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/code&gt;&lt;/pre&gt;&lt;/details&gt;
</content>
        
    </entry>
    <entry xml:lang="en">
        <title>SCATMAN: A Framework for Enhancing Trustworthiness in Digital Supply Chains</title>
        <published>2023-11-01T00:00:00+00:00</published>
        <updated>2026-04-24T00:00:00+00:00</updated>
        
        <author>
          <name>Anirban Basu</name>
        </author>
        
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://anirbanbasu.netlify.app/publications/eckel2023scatman/"/>
        <id>https://anirbanbasu.netlify.app/publications/eckel2023scatman/</id>
        
        <content type="html" xml:base="https://anirbanbasu.netlify.app/publications/eckel2023scatman/">&lt;!-- citation: eckel2023scatman --&gt;
&lt;h3&gt;&lt;i&gt;Michael Eckel, &lt;u&gt;Anirban Basu&lt;/u&gt;, Satoshi Kai, Hevais Simo Fhom, Sinisa Dukanovic, Henk Birkholz, Shingo Hane and Matthias Lieske&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/h3&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&lt;b&gt;Abstract:&lt;/b&gt; In this paper, we present a framework and an architecture that aim to enable and manage trust in supply chains. Our architecture addresses the authenticity and integrity of devices and processes within heterogeneous system landscapes. We identify and discuss the current challenges in digital supply chains and lay out security, privacy, and interoperability requirements that must be met for successful implementation. We hypothesize that the overall perception of trust in a supply chain depends on the trustworthiness of all digital systems involved, including hardware, software, and information flow. Our proposed architecture helps enhance trustworthiness based on verifiable, indisputable, and believable digital evidence for devices and processes in supply chains, including the entire hardware and software lifecycles. We actively advocate for a mixed landscape of centralized and decentralized solutions for the storage of evidence and trust information. This can include traditional centralized databases and distributed ledger technologies. We discuss the auditability and accountability of digital evidence using trust-enabling technologies, and present a preliminary proof-of-concept (PoC) implementation in a real-world application scenario.&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;table class=&quot;table-publication-metadata&quot;&gt;
&lt;tbody&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;
&lt;th scope=&quot;col&quot;&gt;address&lt;/th&gt;
&lt;td&gt;Exeter, UK&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;
&lt;th scope=&quot;col&quot;&gt;booktitle&lt;/th&gt;
&lt;td&gt;Proceedings of the IEEE 22nd International Conference on Trust, Security and Privacy in Computing and Communications (TrustCom)&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;
&lt;th scope=&quot;col&quot;&gt;doi&lt;/th&gt;
&lt;td&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://doi.org/10.1109/TrustCom60117.2023.00110&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;10.1109/TrustCom60117.2023.00110&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;
&lt;th scope=&quot;col&quot;&gt;keywords&lt;/th&gt;
&lt;td&gt;privacy, distributed-ledger, digital-systems, supply-chains, distributed-databases, computer-architecture, software, trustworthiness, integrity, transparency, trusted-computing, confidential-computing, society-5-0, industrie-4-0, digital-twin, supply-chain-security, distributed-system-security, smart-factory, blockchain-technology&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;
&lt;th scope=&quot;col&quot;&gt;month&lt;/th&gt;
&lt;td&gt;11&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;
&lt;th scope=&quot;col&quot;&gt;pages&lt;/th&gt;
&lt;td&gt;750-761&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;/tbody&gt;
&lt;/table&gt;
&lt;details&gt;
&lt;summary&gt;Cite this publication, using BibTeX&lt;/summary&gt;
&lt;pre class=&quot;giallo&quot; style=&quot;color: #F8F8F2; background-color: #272822;&quot; &gt;&lt;code data-lang=&quot;bibtex&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;giallo-l&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;color: #F92672;&quot;&gt;@inproceedings&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span&gt;{&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;color: #A6E22E;text-decoration: underline;&quot;&gt;eckel2023scatman&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span&gt;,&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;
&lt;span class=&quot;giallo-l&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;color: #66D9EF;&quot;&gt;  abstract&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span&gt; = {In this paper, we present a framework and an architecture that aim to enable and manage trust in supply chains. Our architecture addresses the authenticity and integrity of devices and processes within heterogeneous system landscapes. We identify and discuss the current challenges in digital supply chains and lay out security, privacy, and interoperability requirements that must be met for successful implementation. We hypothesize that the overall perception of trust in a supply chain depends on the trustworthiness of all digital systems involved, including hardware, software, and information flow. Our proposed architecture helps enhance trustworthiness based on verifiable, indisputable, and believable digital evidence for devices and processes in supply chains, including the entire hardware and software lifecycles. We actively advocate for a mixed landscape of centralized and decentralized solutions for the storage of evidence and trust information. This can include traditional centralized databases and distributed ledger technologies. We discuss the auditability and accountability of digital evidence using trust-enabling technologies, and present a preliminary proof-of-concept (PoC) implementation in a real-world application scenario.},&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;
&lt;span class=&quot;giallo-l&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;color: #66D9EF;&quot;&gt;  address&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span&gt; = {Exeter, UK},&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;
&lt;span class=&quot;giallo-l&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;color: #66D9EF;&quot;&gt;  author&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span&gt; = {Eckel, Michael and Basu, Anirban and Kai, Satoshi and Simo Fhom, Hevais and Dukanovic, Sinisa and Birkholz, Henk and Hane, Shingo and Lieske, Matthias },&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;
&lt;span class=&quot;giallo-l&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;color: #66D9EF;&quot;&gt;  booktitle&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span&gt; = {Proceedings of the IEEE 22nd International Conference on Trust, Security and Privacy in Computing and Communications (TrustCom)},&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;
&lt;span class=&quot;giallo-l&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;color: #66D9EF;&quot;&gt;  doi&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span&gt; = {10.1109/TrustCom60117.2023.00110},&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;
&lt;span class=&quot;giallo-l&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;color: #66D9EF;&quot;&gt;  keywords&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span&gt; = {Privacy;Distributed ledger;Digital systems;Supply chains;Distributed databases;Computer architecture;Software;trustworthiness;integrity;transparency;Trusted Computing;confidential computing;Society 5.0;Industrie 4.0;digital twin;supply chain security;distributed system security;smart factory;blockchain technology},&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;
&lt;span class=&quot;giallo-l&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;color: #66D9EF;&quot;&gt;  month&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span&gt; = {November},&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;
&lt;span class=&quot;giallo-l&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;color: #66D9EF;&quot;&gt;  pages&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span&gt; = {750-761},&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;
&lt;span class=&quot;giallo-l&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;color: #66D9EF;&quot;&gt;  title&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span&gt; = {SCATMAN: A Framework for Enhancing Trustworthiness in Digital Supply Chains},&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;
&lt;span class=&quot;giallo-l&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;color: #66D9EF;&quot;&gt;  year&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span&gt; = {2023},&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;
&lt;span class=&quot;giallo-l&quot;&gt;&lt;span&gt;}&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/code&gt;&lt;/pre&gt;&lt;/details&gt;
</content>
        
    </entry>
    <entry xml:lang="en">
        <title>Software and its perceived trustworthiness</title>
        <published>2023-10-19T00:00:00+00:00</published>
        <updated>2026-04-24T00:00:00+00:00</updated>
        
        <author>
          <name>Anirban Basu</name>
        </author>
        
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://anirbanbasu.netlify.app/publications/basu2023perceivedtrustworthiness/"/>
        <id>https://anirbanbasu.netlify.app/publications/basu2023perceivedtrustworthiness/</id>
        
        <content type="html" xml:base="https://anirbanbasu.netlify.app/publications/basu2023perceivedtrustworthiness/">&lt;!-- citation: basu2023perceivedtrustworthiness --&gt;
&lt;h3&gt;&lt;i&gt;&lt;u&gt;Anirban Basu&lt;/u&gt; and Satoshi Kai&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/h3&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&lt;b&gt;Abstract:&lt;/b&gt; Trust is a pervasive and essential driver for sustainable interactions between social entities and the functioning of a society as a whole. Trust, from the decisional perspective, has been summarised as &#39;the act of choosing to put oneself into a situation of risk, where the outcomes are dependent on the actions of another&#39; [18]. Trust is observed to be contextual, subjective, idiosyncratic and often only really understood from the perspective of an individual [8]. The term trust system, coined in [23], is &#39;where computational tools, humans and trust reasoning capabilities come together to accomplish something where trust is an enabling factor&#39;. In software supply chains and value chains, adequate measures do not exit beyond attempts to enforce trust through cryptographic verification, in order to faciliate stakeholders to make trust deliberations about the entities in supply and value chains. In this position paper, we propose the blueprint of a framework for the assessment of perceived trustworthiness in software supply chains such that a trustor is empowered, as opposed to enforced, to make decisions based on their trust deliberations.&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;table class=&quot;table-publication-metadata&quot;&gt;
&lt;tbody&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;
&lt;th scope=&quot;col&quot;&gt;address&lt;/th&gt;
&lt;td&gt;Amsterdam, Netherlands&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;
&lt;th scope=&quot;col&quot;&gt;booktitle&lt;/th&gt;
&lt;td&gt;Proceedings of the IFIP WG 11.11 International Conference on Trust Management (IFIPTM)&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;
&lt;th scope=&quot;col&quot;&gt;day&lt;/th&gt;
&lt;td&gt;19&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;
&lt;th scope=&quot;col&quot;&gt;doi&lt;/th&gt;
&lt;td&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-76714-2_7&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;10.1007/978-3-031-76714-2_7&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;
&lt;th scope=&quot;col&quot;&gt;isbn&lt;/th&gt;
&lt;td&gt;978-3-031-76714-2&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;
&lt;th scope=&quot;col&quot;&gt;keywords&lt;/th&gt;
&lt;td&gt;trust, trustworthiness, perceived-trustworthiness, software-supply-chain, security&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;
&lt;th scope=&quot;col&quot;&gt;month&lt;/th&gt;
&lt;td&gt;10&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;
&lt;th scope=&quot;col&quot;&gt;pages&lt;/th&gt;
&lt;td&gt;105-120&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;
&lt;th scope=&quot;col&quot;&gt;publisher&lt;/th&gt;
&lt;td&gt;Springer Nature, Switzerland&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;/tbody&gt;
&lt;/table&gt;
&lt;details&gt;
&lt;summary&gt;Cite this publication, using BibTeX&lt;/summary&gt;
&lt;pre class=&quot;giallo&quot; style=&quot;color: #F8F8F2; background-color: #272822;&quot; &gt;&lt;code data-lang=&quot;bibtex&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;giallo-l&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;color: #F92672;&quot;&gt;@inproceedings&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span&gt;{&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;color: #A6E22E;text-decoration: underline;&quot;&gt;basu2023perceivedtrustworthiness&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span&gt;,&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;
&lt;span class=&quot;giallo-l&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;color: #66D9EF;&quot;&gt;  abstract&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span&gt; = {Trust is a pervasive and essential driver for sustainable interactions between social entities and the functioning of a society as a whole. Trust, from the decisional perspective, has been summarised as &amp;#39;the act of choosing to put oneself into a situation of risk, where the outcomes are dependent on the actions of another&amp;#39; [18]. Trust is observed to be contextual, subjective, idiosyncratic and often only really understood from the perspective of an individual [8]. The term trust system, coined in [23], is &amp;#39;where computational tools, humans and trust reasoning capabilities come together to accomplish something where trust is an enabling factor&amp;#39;. In software supply chains and value chains, adequate measures do not exit beyond attempts to enforce trust through cryptographic verification, in order to faciliate stakeholders to make trust deliberations about the entities in supply and value chains. In this position paper, we propose the blueprint of a framework for the assessment of perceived trustworthiness in software supply chains such that a trustor is empowered, as opposed to enforced, to make decisions based on their trust deliberations.},&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;
&lt;span class=&quot;giallo-l&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;color: #66D9EF;&quot;&gt;  address&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span&gt; = {Amsterdam, Netherlands},&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;
&lt;span class=&quot;giallo-l&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;color: #66D9EF;&quot;&gt;  author&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span&gt; = {Basu, Anirban and Kai, Satoshi},&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;
&lt;span class=&quot;giallo-l&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;color: #66D9EF;&quot;&gt;  booktitle&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span&gt; = {Proceedings of the IFIP WG 11.11 International Conference on Trust Management (IFIPTM)},&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;
&lt;span class=&quot;giallo-l&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;color: #66D9EF;&quot;&gt;  day&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span&gt; = {19},&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;
&lt;span class=&quot;giallo-l&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;color: #66D9EF;&quot;&gt;  doi&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span&gt; = {10.1007/978-3-031-76714-2_7},&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;
&lt;span class=&quot;giallo-l&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;color: #66D9EF;&quot;&gt;  isbn&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span&gt; = {978-3-031-76714-2},&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;
&lt;span class=&quot;giallo-l&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;color: #66D9EF;&quot;&gt;  keywords&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span&gt; = {trust;trustworthiness;perceived trustworthiness;software supply chain;security},&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;
&lt;span class=&quot;giallo-l&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;color: #66D9EF;&quot;&gt;  month&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span&gt; = {October},&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;
&lt;span class=&quot;giallo-l&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;color: #66D9EF;&quot;&gt;  pages&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span&gt; = {105-120},&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;
&lt;span class=&quot;giallo-l&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;color: #66D9EF;&quot;&gt;  publisher&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span&gt; = {Springer Nature, Switzerland},&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;
&lt;span class=&quot;giallo-l&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;color: #66D9EF;&quot;&gt;  title&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span&gt; = {Software and its perceived trustworthiness},&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;
&lt;span class=&quot;giallo-l&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;color: #66D9EF;&quot;&gt;  year&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span&gt; = {2023},&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;
&lt;span class=&quot;giallo-l&quot;&gt;&lt;span&gt;}&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/code&gt;&lt;/pre&gt;&lt;/details&gt;
</content>
        
    </entry>
    <entry xml:lang="en">
        <title>The ethical implications of using digital traces: studying explainability and trust during a pandemic</title>
        <published>2021-11-29T00:00:00+00:00</published>
        <updated>2026-04-24T00:00:00+00:00</updated>
        
        <author>
          <name>Anirban Basu</name>
        </author>
        
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://anirbanbasu.netlify.app/publications/dwyer2021ethical/"/>
        <id>https://anirbanbasu.netlify.app/publications/dwyer2021ethical/</id>
        
        <content type="html" xml:base="https://anirbanbasu.netlify.app/publications/dwyer2021ethical/">&lt;!-- citation: dwyer2021ethical --&gt;
&lt;h3&gt;&lt;i&gt;Natasha Dwyer, Hector Miller-Bakewell, Tessa Darbyshire, &lt;u&gt;Anirban Basu&lt;/u&gt; and Steve Marsh&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/h3&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&lt;b&gt;Abstract:&lt;/b&gt; Digital technologies give researchers new opportunities to access the most personal thoughts of those who use them. The ethics and implications of using data from peoples&#39; everyday interactions have recently become a mainstream topic of concern (Lucivero, 2020). In some contexts, such as governance, it can be argued that algorithmically-generated decisions are valued over individuals&#39; and communities&#39; expertise (Danaher, 2016). As with other projects described in this book, our work is being carried out during the COVID-19 pandemic. The crisis has highlighted the ethical complications that occur when vulnerable individuals requiring information are surveilled in a rapidly changing environment. Currently, worldwide legislative changes are determining how data-intensive technologies, including forms of data collection and surveillance, are used. Recent history indicates that once the initial threat has passed, legislation remains and becomes the &#39;new normal&#39; (Lodders and Paterson, 2020). Organisations, including universities, are establishing mechanisms for collecting and managing stakeholder data, which will remain in place after the pandemic. The collected data will become part of the hidden curriculum, the subtle messages students receive about what an institution values, and the nature of the power relations inherent in its interactions (Kayama et al, 2015). In this chapter we outline and engage with the ethical practices involved in performing such data collection, with a particular focus on the use of chatbot transcripts. We particularly highlight the impact of crisis scenarios on &#39;information anxiety&#39; (Blundell et al, 2014) in undergraduate students and evaluate the potential of chatbots as a tool to improve information literacy. Chatbots can be used to enable individuals to seek information ranging from functional to personal, including information that may be sensitive or personal in nature.&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;table class=&quot;table-publication-metadata&quot;&gt;
&lt;tbody&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;
&lt;th scope=&quot;col&quot;&gt;address&lt;/th&gt;
&lt;td&gt;Bristol, UK&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;
&lt;th scope=&quot;col&quot;&gt;booktitle&lt;/th&gt;
&lt;td&gt;Qualitative and Digital Research in Times of Crisis: Methods, Reflexivity, and Ethics&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;
&lt;th scope=&quot;col&quot;&gt;day&lt;/th&gt;
&lt;td&gt;29&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;
&lt;th scope=&quot;col&quot;&gt;doi&lt;/th&gt;
&lt;td&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://doi.org/10.51952/9781447363828.ch008&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;10.51952/9781447363828.ch008&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;
&lt;th scope=&quot;col&quot;&gt;keywords&lt;/th&gt;
&lt;td&gt;social-research-methods, qualitative-methods, creative-methods, disaster-and-crisis-management, research-practices, research-ethics, research-reflexivity, researcher-positionality, digital-research-methods, digital-data, digital-traces, data-ethics, data-privacy, data-protection, data-security, data-sharing, data-reuse&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;
&lt;th scope=&quot;col&quot;&gt;month&lt;/th&gt;
&lt;td&gt;11&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;
&lt;th scope=&quot;col&quot;&gt;pages&lt;/th&gt;
&lt;td&gt;129-142&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;
&lt;th scope=&quot;col&quot;&gt;publisher&lt;/th&gt;
&lt;td&gt;Policy Press&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;
&lt;th scope=&quot;col&quot;&gt;url&lt;/th&gt;
&lt;td&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://bristoluniversitypressdigital.com/view/book/9781447363828/ch008.xml&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;Link&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;/tbody&gt;
&lt;/table&gt;
&lt;details&gt;
&lt;summary&gt;Cite this publication, using BibTeX&lt;/summary&gt;
&lt;pre class=&quot;giallo&quot; style=&quot;color: #F8F8F2; background-color: #272822;&quot; &gt;&lt;code data-lang=&quot;bibtex&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;giallo-l&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;color: #F92672;&quot;&gt;@incollection&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span&gt;{&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;color: #A6E22E;text-decoration: underline;&quot;&gt;dwyer2021ethical&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span&gt;,&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;
&lt;span class=&quot;giallo-l&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;color: #66D9EF;&quot;&gt;  abstract&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span&gt; = {Digital technologies give researchers new opportunities to access the most personal thoughts of those who use them. The ethics and implications of using data from peoples&amp;#39; everyday interactions have recently become a mainstream topic of concern (Lucivero, 2020). In some contexts, such as governance, it can be argued that algorithmically-generated decisions are valued over individuals&amp;#39; and communities&amp;#39; expertise (Danaher, 2016). As with other projects described in this book, our work is being carried out during the COVID-19 pandemic. The crisis has highlighted the ethical complications that occur when vulnerable individuals requiring information are surveilled in a rapidly changing environment. Currently, worldwide legislative changes are determining how data-intensive technologies, including forms of data collection and surveillance, are used. Recent history indicates that once the initial threat has passed, legislation remains and becomes the &amp;#39;new normal&amp;#39; (Lodders and Paterson, 2020). Organisations, including universities, are establishing mechanisms for collecting and managing stakeholder data, which will remain in place after the pandemic. The collected data will become part of the hidden curriculum, the subtle messages students receive about what an institution values, and the nature of the power relations inherent in its interactions (Kayama et al, 2015). In this chapter we outline and engage with the ethical practices involved in performing such data collection, with a particular focus on the use of chatbot transcripts. We particularly highlight the impact of crisis scenarios on &amp;#39;information anxiety&amp;#39; (Blundell et al, 2014) in undergraduate students and evaluate the potential of chatbots as a tool to improve information literacy. Chatbots can be used to enable individuals to seek information ranging from functional to personal, including information that may be sensitive or personal in nature.},&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;
&lt;span class=&quot;giallo-l&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;color: #66D9EF;&quot;&gt;  address&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span&gt; = {Bristol, UK},&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;
&lt;span class=&quot;giallo-l&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;color: #66D9EF;&quot;&gt;  author&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span&gt; = {Dwyer, Natasha and Miller-Bakewell, Hector and Darbyshire, Tessa and Basu, Anirban and Marsh, Steve},&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;
&lt;span class=&quot;giallo-l&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;color: #66D9EF;&quot;&gt;  booktitle&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span&gt; = {Qualitative and Digital Research in Times of Crisis: Methods, Reflexivity, and Ethics},&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;
&lt;span class=&quot;giallo-l&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;color: #66D9EF;&quot;&gt;  day&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span&gt; = {29},&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;
&lt;span class=&quot;giallo-l&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;color: #66D9EF;&quot;&gt;  doi&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span&gt; = {10.51952/9781447363828.ch008},&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;
&lt;span class=&quot;giallo-l&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;color: #66D9EF;&quot;&gt;  keywords&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span&gt; = {Social research methods; Qualitative methods; Creative methods; Disaster and crisis management; Research practices; Research ethics; Research reflexivity; Researcher positionality; Digital research methods; Digital data; Digital traces; Data ethics; Data privacy; Data protection; Data security; Data sharing; Data reuse},&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;
&lt;span class=&quot;giallo-l&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;color: #66D9EF;&quot;&gt;  month&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span&gt; = {November},&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;
&lt;span class=&quot;giallo-l&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;color: #66D9EF;&quot;&gt;  pages&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span&gt; = {129-142},&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;
&lt;span class=&quot;giallo-l&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;color: #66D9EF;&quot;&gt;  publisher&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span&gt; = {Policy Press},&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;
&lt;span class=&quot;giallo-l&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;color: #66D9EF;&quot;&gt;  title&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span&gt; = {The ethical implications of using digital traces: studying explainability and trust during a pandemic},&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;
&lt;span class=&quot;giallo-l&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;color: #66D9EF;&quot;&gt;  url&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span&gt; = {https://bristoluniversitypressdigital.com/view/book/9781447363828/ch008.xml},&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;
&lt;span class=&quot;giallo-l&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;color: #66D9EF;&quot;&gt;  year&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span&gt; = {2021},&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;
&lt;span class=&quot;giallo-l&quot;&gt;&lt;span&gt;}&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/code&gt;&lt;/pre&gt;&lt;/details&gt;
</content>
        
    </entry>
    <entry xml:lang="en">
        <title>Thinking about Trust: People, Process, and Place</title>
        <published>2020-06-12T00:00:00+00:00</published>
        <updated>2026-04-24T00:00:00+00:00</updated>
        
        <author>
          <name>Anirban Basu</name>
        </author>
        
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://anirbanbasu.netlify.app/publications/marsh2020thinking/"/>
        <id>https://anirbanbasu.netlify.app/publications/marsh2020thinking/</id>
        
        <content type="html" xml:base="https://anirbanbasu.netlify.app/publications/marsh2020thinking/">&lt;!-- citation: marsh2020thinking --&gt;
&lt;h3&gt;&lt;i&gt;Stephen Marsh, Tosan Atele-Williams, &lt;u&gt;Anirban Basu&lt;/u&gt;, Natasha Dwyer, Peter R. Lewis, Hector Miller-Bakewell and Jeremy Pitt&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/h3&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&lt;b&gt;Abstract:&lt;/b&gt; This brief paper is about trust. It explores the phenomenon from various angles, with the implicit assumptions that trust can be measured in some ways, that trust can be compared and rated, and that trust is of worth when we consider entities from data, through artificial intelligences, to humans, with side trips along the way to animals. It explores trust systems and trust empowerment as opposed to trust enforcement, the creation of trust models, applications of trust, and the reasons why trust is of worth.&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;table class=&quot;table-publication-metadata&quot;&gt;
&lt;tbody&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;
&lt;th scope=&quot;col&quot;&gt;day&lt;/th&gt;
&lt;td&gt;12&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;
&lt;th scope=&quot;col&quot;&gt;doi&lt;/th&gt;
&lt;td&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://doi.org/10.1016/j.patter.2020.100039&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;10.1016/j.patter.2020.100039&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;
&lt;th scope=&quot;col&quot;&gt;issue&lt;/th&gt;
&lt;td&gt;3&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;
&lt;th scope=&quot;col&quot;&gt;journal&lt;/th&gt;
&lt;td&gt;Elsevier Cell Patterns&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;
&lt;th scope=&quot;col&quot;&gt;keywords&lt;/th&gt;
&lt;td&gt;trust, trustworthiness, data, people, trust-empowerment, artificial-intelligence&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;
&lt;th scope=&quot;col&quot;&gt;month&lt;/th&gt;
&lt;td&gt;06&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;
&lt;th scope=&quot;col&quot;&gt;publisher&lt;/th&gt;
&lt;td&gt;Elsevier&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;
&lt;th scope=&quot;col&quot;&gt;volume&lt;/th&gt;
&lt;td&gt;1&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;/tbody&gt;
&lt;/table&gt;
&lt;details&gt;
&lt;summary&gt;Cite this publication, using BibTeX&lt;/summary&gt;
&lt;pre class=&quot;giallo&quot; style=&quot;color: #F8F8F2; background-color: #272822;&quot; &gt;&lt;code data-lang=&quot;bibtex&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;giallo-l&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;color: #F92672;&quot;&gt;@article&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span&gt;{&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;color: #A6E22E;text-decoration: underline;&quot;&gt;marsh2020thinking&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span&gt;,&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;
&lt;span class=&quot;giallo-l&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;color: #66D9EF;&quot;&gt;  abstract&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span&gt; = {This brief paper is about trust. It explores the phenomenon from various angles, with the implicit assumptions that trust can be measured in some ways, that trust can be compared and rated, and that trust is of worth when we consider entities from data, through artificial intelligences, to humans, with side trips along the way to animals. It explores trust systems and trust empowerment as opposed to trust enforcement, the creation of trust models, applications of trust, and the reasons why trust is of worth.},&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;
&lt;span class=&quot;giallo-l&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;color: #66D9EF;&quot;&gt;  author&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span&gt; = {Marsh, Stephen and Atele-Williams, Tosan and Basu, Anirban and Dwyer, Natasha and Lewis, Peter R.\  and Miller-Bakewell, Hector and Pitt, Jeremy},&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;
&lt;span class=&quot;giallo-l&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;color: #66D9EF;&quot;&gt;  day&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span&gt; = {12},&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;
&lt;span class=&quot;giallo-l&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;color: #66D9EF;&quot;&gt;  doi&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span&gt; = {10.1016/j.patter.2020.100039},&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;
&lt;span class=&quot;giallo-l&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;color: #66D9EF;&quot;&gt;  issue&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span&gt; = {3},&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;
&lt;span class=&quot;giallo-l&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;color: #66D9EF;&quot;&gt;  journal&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span&gt; = {Elsevier Cell Patterns},&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;
&lt;span class=&quot;giallo-l&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;color: #66D9EF;&quot;&gt;  keywords&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span&gt; = {trust;trustworthiness;data;people;trust empowerment;artificial intelligence},&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;
&lt;span class=&quot;giallo-l&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;color: #66D9EF;&quot;&gt;  month&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span&gt; = {June},&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;
&lt;span class=&quot;giallo-l&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;color: #66D9EF;&quot;&gt;  publisher&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span&gt; = {Elsevier},&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;
&lt;span class=&quot;giallo-l&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;color: #66D9EF;&quot;&gt;  title&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span&gt; = {Thinking about Trust: People, Process, and Place},&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;
&lt;span class=&quot;giallo-l&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;color: #66D9EF;&quot;&gt;  volume&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span&gt; = {1},&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;
&lt;span class=&quot;giallo-l&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;color: #66D9EF;&quot;&gt;  year&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span&gt; = {2020},&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;
&lt;span class=&quot;giallo-l&quot;&gt;&lt;span&gt;}&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/code&gt;&lt;/pre&gt;&lt;/details&gt;
</content>
        
    </entry>
    <entry xml:lang="en">
        <title>Privacy-friendly platform for healthcare data in cloud based on blockchain environment</title>
        <published>2019-01-08T00:00:00+00:00</published>
        <updated>2026-04-24T00:00:00+00:00</updated>
        
        <author>
          <name>Anirban Basu</name>
        </author>
        
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://anirbanbasu.netlify.app/publications/alomar2019/"/>
        <id>https://anirbanbasu.netlify.app/publications/alomar2019/</id>
        
        <content type="html" xml:base="https://anirbanbasu.netlify.app/publications/alomar2019/">&lt;!-- citation: ALOMAR2019 --&gt;
&lt;h3&gt;&lt;i&gt;Abdullah Al Omar, Md Zakirul Alam Bhuiyan, &lt;u&gt;Anirban Basu&lt;/u&gt;, Shinsaku Kiyomoto and Mohammad Shahriar Rahman&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/h3&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&lt;b&gt;Abstract:&lt;/b&gt; Data in cloud has always been a point of attraction for the cyber attackers. Nowadays healthcare data in cloud has become their new interest. Attacks on these healthcare data can result in annihilating consequences for the healthcare organizations. Decentralization of these cloud data can minimize the effect of attacks. Storing and running computation on sensitive private healthcare data in cloud are possible by decentralization which is enabled by peer to peer (P2P) network. By leveraging the decentralized or distributed property, blockchain technology ensures the accountability and integrity. Different solutions have been proposed to control the effect of attacks using decentralized approach but these solutions somehow failed to ensure overall privacy of patient centric systems. In this paper, we present a patient centric healthcare data management system using blockchain technology as storage which helps to attain privacy. Cryptographic functions are used to encrypt patient&#39;s data and to ensure pseudonymity. We analyze the data processing procedures and also the cost effectiveness of the smart contracts used in our system.&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;table class=&quot;table-publication-metadata&quot;&gt;
&lt;tbody&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;
&lt;th scope=&quot;col&quot;&gt;day&lt;/th&gt;
&lt;td&gt;08&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;
&lt;th scope=&quot;col&quot;&gt;doi&lt;/th&gt;
&lt;td&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://doi.org/10.1016/j.future.2018.12.044&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;10.1016/j.future.2018.12.044&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;
&lt;th scope=&quot;col&quot;&gt;issn&lt;/th&gt;
&lt;td&gt;0167-739X&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;
&lt;th scope=&quot;col&quot;&gt;journal&lt;/th&gt;
&lt;td&gt;Future Generation Computer Systems&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;
&lt;th scope=&quot;col&quot;&gt;keywords&lt;/th&gt;
&lt;td&gt;blockchain, decentralization, healthcare-data-in-cloud, pseudonymity, privacy, security, smart-contract&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;
&lt;th scope=&quot;col&quot;&gt;month&lt;/th&gt;
&lt;td&gt;01&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;
&lt;th scope=&quot;col&quot;&gt;pages&lt;/th&gt;
&lt;td&gt;511–521&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;
&lt;th scope=&quot;col&quot;&gt;volume&lt;/th&gt;
&lt;td&gt;95&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;/tbody&gt;
&lt;/table&gt;
&lt;details&gt;
&lt;summary&gt;Cite this publication, using BibTeX&lt;/summary&gt;
&lt;pre class=&quot;giallo&quot; style=&quot;color: #F8F8F2; background-color: #272822;&quot; &gt;&lt;code data-lang=&quot;bibtex&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;giallo-l&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;color: #F92672;&quot;&gt;@article&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span&gt;{&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;color: #A6E22E;text-decoration: underline;&quot;&gt;ALOMAR2019&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span&gt;,&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;
&lt;span class=&quot;giallo-l&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;color: #66D9EF;&quot;&gt;  abstract&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span&gt; = {Data in cloud has always been a point of attraction for the cyber attackers. Nowadays healthcare data in cloud has become their new interest. Attacks on these healthcare data can result in annihilating consequences for the healthcare organizations. Decentralization of these cloud data can minimize the effect of attacks. Storing and running computation on sensitive private healthcare data in cloud are possible by decentralization which is enabled by peer to peer (P2P) network. By leveraging the decentralized or distributed property, blockchain technology ensures the accountability and integrity. Different solutions have been proposed to control the effect of attacks using decentralized approach but these solutions somehow failed to ensure overall privacy of patient centric systems. In this paper, we present a patient centric healthcare data management system using blockchain technology as storage which helps to attain privacy. Cryptographic functions are used to encrypt patient&amp;#39;s data and to ensure pseudonymity. We analyze the data processing procedures and also the cost effectiveness of the smart contracts used in our system.},&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;
&lt;span class=&quot;giallo-l&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;color: #66D9EF;&quot;&gt;  author&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span&gt; = {Abdullah Al Omar and Md Zakirul Alam Bhuiyan and Basu, Anirban and Shinsaku Kiyomoto and Mohammad Shahriar Rahman},&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;
&lt;span class=&quot;giallo-l&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;color: #66D9EF;&quot;&gt;  day&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span&gt; = {8},&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;
&lt;span class=&quot;giallo-l&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;color: #66D9EF;&quot;&gt;  doi&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span&gt; = {10.1016/j.future.2018.12.044},&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;
&lt;span class=&quot;giallo-l&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;color: #66D9EF;&quot;&gt;  issn&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span&gt; = {0167-739X},&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;
&lt;span class=&quot;giallo-l&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;color: #66D9EF;&quot;&gt;  journal&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span&gt; = {Future Generation Computer Systems},&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;
&lt;span class=&quot;giallo-l&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;color: #66D9EF;&quot;&gt;  keywords&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span&gt; = {Blockchain, Decentralization, Healthcare data in cloud, Pseudonymity, Privacy, Security, Smart contract},&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;
&lt;span class=&quot;giallo-l&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;color: #66D9EF;&quot;&gt;  month&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span&gt; = {January},&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;
&lt;span class=&quot;giallo-l&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;color: #66D9EF;&quot;&gt;  pages&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span&gt; = {511–521},&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;
&lt;span class=&quot;giallo-l&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;color: #66D9EF;&quot;&gt;  title&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span&gt; = {Privacy-friendly platform for healthcare data in cloud based on blockchain environment},&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;
&lt;span class=&quot;giallo-l&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;color: #66D9EF;&quot;&gt;  volume&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span&gt; = {95},&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;
&lt;span class=&quot;giallo-l&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;color: #66D9EF;&quot;&gt;  year&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span&gt; = {2019},&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;
&lt;span class=&quot;giallo-l&quot;&gt;&lt;span&gt;}&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/code&gt;&lt;/pre&gt;&lt;/details&gt;
</content>
        
    </entry>
</feed>
